Activity 4: Reading an article and searching for relevant references
We were asked to read Seely Brown and Adler (2008), Minds on fire: open education, the long tail and learning 2.0, and then follow through on some of projects mentioned. This article, despite it's very cool title, has the feel of being a quite out of date and a couple of broken links leading presumably to dead or wound down projects only help reinforce that impression. I was interested in the KEEP Toolkit and though some parts seem to still exist (this link goes to a page containing links to papers written about the project) unfortunately the main repository is offline. When teaching I found a number of similar projects, perhaps too many? It was difficult to decide which to contribute to, if any. Some of the other projects I had already heard of and even explored, like the Decameron web (include "web" in the search term or one is likely to be whisked off to a holiday resort).
However, I was attracted by the term "Learning 2.0" and soon found that Steve Wheeler, someone I already "follow", had written an interesting blog about it. He develops some thoughts about Felderman's 4 Cs (Connection, Context, Complexity and Connotation). I particularly liked his retort to Bill Gate's statement that content is king, with the proposal that in education context is king. Although there is a tremendous amount of learning content available, it is the educators role, to put this content into context.
Mandy to what extent do you think these sorts of binaries such as "content v context" help or hinder educational debate?
ReplyDelete